Some text editors (all but MS notepad, in that list) are enhanced to work better as source-code editors – so they can apply colors, run macros, and help make coding easier. Their emphasis is on editing the text that will be in a plaintext file on disk the how it looks is focused on making it easier to edit the text. Text editors (Notepad++, MS notepad, SciTE, vim, emacs) are made for actually editing plaintext. Word processors (MS Word, OpenOffice Writer, etc) are made to be able to fiddle with alignments, fonts, and presentation stuff. When did “they” change the definition of “text”? I guess customer service or manual labor might be worse, but I’m not sure.)
(As an engineer, I cannot image a much worse career than having to deal with advertising and marketing for 50 years. I wouldn’t wish 50 years of advertising, marketing, PCs, and Macs on even my worst enemy, let alone a random stranger on the internet. That sounds like you’ve led a difficult life. I’ve been in advertising and in marketing for over 50 years and been working with PC’s and Mac’s since the mid-80’s. But it is an excellent text editor, and I consider it one of the best. Said in How to CENTER Strange that it is listed everywhere, including here, for example ( ) as one of the top 5 or 10 “text editors”.Įverywhere? Doubtful.
0 kommentar(er)
